"The reasoning must be made clear, not vague. This time I submitted three motions, and the other two are already on Kroll. During the hearing, many issues were not clearly discussed and were avoided, so I submitted the motions one after another to ensure these issues receive clear responses. The disputed claims have never received a clear answer; they only provide a template response, which is equivalent to no reply at all, leaving creditors completely unaware of their claim status. Creditors have never been given a clear process for modifying their overseas residence; we have had to figure it out ourselves. Even when modifications are made, there is no clear response, and we do not know if we will receive compensation. There has been ongoing discussion about where the standards for "restricted judicial areas" and "non-restricted judicial areas" lie. I have never seen the standards. Why should I waste my time being dragged into this motion? Isn't it better for me to play golf, eat watermelon, and sleep in during the hot summer? You want us to be forced into this without any standards; is that reasonable? Please make the standards public. The above is the core content of my two motions: Motion to Compel the FTX Recovery Trust and Kroll to Provide Substantive Responses to Creditor Inquiries and to Establish Clear Procedures for Address and Jurisdictional Updates Motion for an Order Directing the Debtors to Disclose the Standards and Criteria Used to Distinguish Between "Potentially Restricted Jurisdictions" and "Unrestricted Jurisdictions" #FTX #Bankruptcy #CreditorRights #LegalMotion #RestrictedJurisdictions #FTXRecoveryTrust #ClearStandards"

The reasoning must be made clear, not vague. This time I submitted 3 motions, and the other two are already on Kroll. During the hearing, many issues were left unresolved and bypassed, so I am submitting motions one after another to make sure these issues are addressed clearly. Disputed claims have never been given a clear response, just a template reply, which is effectively no reply, and creditors are left in the dark about the status of their claims. There has never been a clear process for changing foreign residence addresses for creditors. We have had to figure it out ourselves, and even after making changes, there is no clear answer as to whether we will receive compensation. The standards for “Restricted Jurisdictions” and “Unrestricted Jurisdictions” have never been presented. Why should I waste my time being dragged into this motion? Isn't it better for me to play golf, eat watermelon, and sleep in during the summer? If there are no standards, why force us into this? Please make the standards public. These are the core contents of my two motions: Motion to Compel the FTX Recovery Trust and Kroll to Provide Substantive Responses to Creditor Inquiries and to Establish Clear Procedures for Address and Jurisdictional Updates Motion for an Order Directing the Debtors to Disclose the Standards and Criteria Used to Distinguish Between “Potentially Restricted Jurisdictions” and “Unrestricted Jurisdictions” #FTX #Bankruptcy #CreditorRights #LegalMotion #RestrictedJurisdictions #FTXRecoveryTrust #ClearStandards