Politics/anime barrier continues to get more and more porous. This will be a major trend over the next 15 years as various (mainly minor) parties try to adopt various anime character traits and tropes for attention.

What @danrobinson said. If regulatory clarity just involves replacing the current inscrutable regime that no one can register under or operate in with another complex regime that requires a phalanx of lawyers & millions of dollars to comprehend, this exercise will have failed.

When crafting a durable regulatory regime for crypto, details matter and simplicity for founders is paramount. This week, @paradigm and our friends at @multicoincap, @RibbitCapital, @galaxyhq, @chainlink, @ElectricCapital, and @tribecap filed a joint letter underscoring this. 👇🏼

If you're not in the middle of crypto market structure legislative wrangling, it's probably easy to think the details don't matter. But they do. In our view, the Senate bill creates the most durable framework. Check out our full comments below.

Can the Mayor of NYC create a new agency without city council or Albany approval and devote resources to it of their own authority? Asking because of a rumor circulating.

First time I’ve ever seen a flash sale on United to the South Pacific, let alone for such a small number of miles (usually, this would be a 100k plus each way). Leisure travel must be falling like a rock.

This is true, & it will benefit kids with folks of similar mindsets (eg college and graduate programs) but probably be an issue in the workforce. Like all generations, the elite workers of the 2030s-2040s will marry video nativity & written skill and modulate to their audience.

I figured this was some crank, not Lina Khan’s chief of staff.

I guess it’s official AELP position that @DKThomp is a liar. That’s good, for too long AELP has acted like it’s not responsible for what its “policy director” says in his random social media ejaculations. Better to have things out in the open.

This is genuinely unbelievable. These antitrust goobers don't seem to realize that I have a telephone. This whole pathetic, pissy thread is about how I'm lying about my conversation with the real estate analyst Lance Lambert and misrepresenting him in my article. So, guess what I just did? Called Lance, of course! He told me again that he agrees with all of my major points and reiterated over and over that he's "pushing back" on the strongest claims of the antitrust left. Some notes from our call: 1. I read him the quotes from my article again in their full context. He signed off on everything. We went over it three times. He agrees with my language. He agrees with my position. "I stand by what I told you." That's a direct quote. 2. I asked him again, for clarification: Do you think homebuilders are a “cartel,” as Matt Stoller has claimed? He said no. 3. I asked again: Do you believe, as Basel Musharbash has claimed, that homebuilders are an “oligopoly"? He said no. 4. I asked him if he thinks that the biggest homebuilders are withholding supply or playing a key role in driving up prices. He said absolutely not. 5. This is a direct quote: "I hope you both communicate my view that I don't think the big builders are bad actors, or even that they have the power to be the bad actors." We're done here.