Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

Jonathan Haidt
It's not just a rise in mental illness and a decline of attentional capacity. There is also a set of personality changes that will make it harder for young people to succeed.
@jburnmurdoch thinks smartphones and streaming services are likely culprits:

Derek Thompson11 tuntia sitten
Like everything @jburnmurdoch makes, this chart is amazing.
The sharp decline in conscientiousness and rise in neuroticism among young people is astonishing.
But also of note: literally every age group has gotten less extroverted in the age of the smartphone

52,57K
Teachers, please come, lets talk

ShareMyLesson7.8. klo 03.57
Are you curious why teen anxiety and depression surged around the early 2010s? Join the @AFTunion Book Club for a conversation with Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation and AFT President Randi Weingarten on Aug. 24. Register: @shankerinst

33,65K
Here's an RCT showing that phone-free CLASSROOMS produce slightly higher grades--and more support for phone free classrooms. Students like it.
I believe the benefits would be much larger for phone-free SCHOOLS.

Alp Sungu5.8. klo 03.14
📲✖️Should phones be banned in classrooms?
Our study with 17,000 students finds:
Removing phones improves grades, especially for struggling students!
🧵
(with @andbjn and P. Choudhury)
Half of global education systems have phone bans in classrooms, particularly in K-12 settings, BUT these policies are exercised with an absence of a large-scale controlled study. Little is known about whether or how they work (
This is where our research comes into play. We partnered with 10 higher education institutions. Half of the students had to put their phones in a box during lectures throughout a semester.
💡Findings:
1. Better grades: Mandatory phone deposition boosted grades by 0.078 standard deviations, about the same effect as the gap between having a very good or a mediocre teacher for a year. First-year, lower-performing, and non-STEM students benefited the most.
2. Students liked it: Students experiencing the ban became significantly more supportive of phone ban policies. Many policymakers worry as ban policies appear restrictive. Increased support after first-hand experience is an important indicator for phone bans being a realistic, non-invasive policy.
3. No major side effects: there was a mild uptick in FOMO, but no adverse effects on student distraction, well-being, academic motivation, digital use, or online harassment.
🎯 We also did spot checks!
4. A healthier classroom environment: study coordinators randomly visited thousands of lectures to take a peek into the classroom dynamics. Students were observed as less chit-chatting and disrupting the lecture, along with reduced phone usage(!) and increased engagement by teachers.

41,69K
Jonathan Haidt kirjasi uudelleen
When do we get to the “Haidt 2.0 wrote a book and it turns out that using AI as teachers, friends, kids, therapists, spending all day with it, was a disaster and we need to ban it for kids and try to restrict our own use”
Can we do this whole thing faster than with social media?
31,52K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit
Ketjussa trendaava
Trendaa X:ssä
Viimeisimmät suosituimmat rahoitukset
Merkittävin