Glamsterdam may be getting some attention (it is a fork for Q1/Q2 2026). In the meantime, we should be more concerned about any potential delays to Fusaka (Q4 2025). As I have said many times, no amount of talking about Ethereum's roadmap and vision matters if we cannot achieve coordination levels that consistently meet goals on schedule. I know that some extremely talented people are now working on resolving the issues that caused teams to suggest moving the dates. I would love to see a broad agreement that the timelines matter a lot. A lot.

I have suggested coordinators a few weeks ago to stop discussing Glamsterdam and focus on delivery of Fusaka. Maybe sometimes less ACD calls may help with the process? Maybe the 'future fork' calls should not be happening when the current fork testnet timelines are at risk?