Sui writes 11 kilos (24 lbs) of code and designs per day.

Welcome to the new internet era... where even if your best password is 12345678, you enter crypto without even noticing you're on crypto. These small details...

Sui's Quantum Safety breakthrough has been accepted to the ACM CCS 2025 posters session, taking place this October in Taiwan! For those unfamiliar with academic conferences, @TheOfficialACM CCS is one of the top and most prestigious events in the whole communications security field; many of the ideas published there shape humanity's web security future. All 4 reviewers unanimously recognized its potential for major impact, offering an initial peer-reviewed validation that EdDSA-based chains like Sui, Solana, NEAR, Cosmos, Aptos, and Cardano have a smoother, backward-compatible path to post-quantum security than Ethereum or Bitcoin. An extended version is on the way, highlighting how these insights lay a foundational groundwork for quantum-safe transitions even beyond blockchains. cc'ing press who already covered the topic: @Cointelegraph @CriptoAZ @DecryptMedia @dragonwolftech @CCNDotComNews @TCR_news_ @blockchainrptr @pet_mwas @Onesafeio

Today I’m working on encrypted trading…

🚨 Sui's recent innovation is a Paradigm Shift in post-quantum migration, and it’s NOT JUST about blockchains. The new EdDSA-PQR protocol introduces a way to prove post-quantum ownership of a key without changing the address or rotating the private key. Why does this matter far beyond crypto? 🧵👇 1/ In blockchains, changing addresses or rotating keys breaks asset access, and is impossible for dormant users in @SuiNetwork, @solana, @NEARProtocol, @cosmos, @Cardano and co. EdDSA-PQR solves that with ZK proofs of ownership based on seed-derived keys, enabling a forkless, migration-ready path. 2/ But here's the real kicker: This method can help any system where root keys are burned-in or hard to rotate: – TLS root certs on embedded devices – VPN clients with fixed certificates – IoT firmware signing keys – HSMs, ID cards, TEEs – OS bootloaders & VM root anchors – Notary services that depend on immutable cryptographic anchors 3/ In these systems, key rotation is expensive, risky, or simply impossible. But compliance, forward security, and future trust will require quantum resilience. This creates a tension: how do you gain post-quantum guarantees without touching legacy keys? 4/ The new proposal makes this possible: As long as the key was derived from a seed (as in canonical EdDSA), a STARK or Ligero zero-knowledge proof of ownership can be generated, with quantum-safe assurances... all while keeping the key and identifier intact. 5/ Yes, a software or firmware update is needed to support the new logic, but you don’t need to regenerate keys, reissue identities, or break compatibility. This decouples quantum-readiness from the painful key migration process. 6/ This matters across industries: – A hardware wallet with EdDSA keys burned in at the factory can prove quantum-safe ownership. – A VPN router in the field since 2018 can assert a PQ upgrade path. – A passport chip can verify quantum resilience, without being reissued. 7/ And the impact goes deeper (cryptographers please read that): This work hints that future cryptographic standards, including @NIST post-quantum schemes should consider adopting hashed-seed key derivation rather than exposing raw private material. This design principle gives us a fallback: If lattices (or any other new primitive) are broken later, hashed seeds would let us evolve without rotating addresses or secrets again. Read @billatnapier's post: 8/ So this isn’t just a blockchain fix. It’s a shift in cryptographic thinking, towards forward-compatible key material that can prove security across eras, algorithms, and threat models. 9/ We believe this could influence how keys are generated and stored across all cryptographic systems in the coming years, including identity layers, infrastructure trust anchors, and post-quantum TLS/VPN stacks. Maybe before full quantum safe transition by 2030-35 most entities should at least switch now to EdDSA just in case. To sum up: “We showed that you can wrap a legacy key in quantum safety, without changing the public key or breaking the system. This may reshape how we generate and future-proof private keys going forward.”

Dog Robots will be running on Sui. First experiments are out, Sui will be the global network of everything of things. Ex NASA dev and researcher behind it @irvinxyz.

Sleepless long weekend for me. 100 SUI to whoever finds what I’m working on. Sha256 hash of my secret plan: 153b972725c8194182a060aafa8a7996503bf36a22d74e7cc49f13a8f8593eb7

Walrus Sui and Mysten Labs started hiring robot experts, wait for some miracle devices during Token2049 in Singapore.

Robots: After many last moment requests we’ll extend the deadline to end of August. Afaik 4 teams across the world explore and compete at the moment. Good luck, $10K in SUI wait for their next owner(s).

Many ask me since our yesterday’s post around EdDSA Vs ECDSA quantum safety readiness and Bitcoin: Q: why didn’t Satoshi use EdDSA in Bitcoin? A: Satoshi couldn’t have used EdDSA in Bitcoin because it simply didn’t exist yet when Bitcoin was created. EdDSA was invented in 2011, a few years after Bitcoin’s creation (2008–2009).