Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

TrenTok-Chad ⚡️
chief @stryke_xyz | case opener @casedotfun | $SYK maxi | Making onchain fun again
TrenTok-Chad ⚡️ kirjasi uudelleen
Simulation overlords making $ETH underperform for 4 years, while $SOL, then $HYPE outperformed. Bankless subhuman tier losers capitulated then some Asian Wall St. Cuck manager fully sent $ETH to $8k while all of CT got rugged on KOLs, leverage, memecoins, and missing the forest in the trees...
is poetry?
32,59K
TrenTok-Chad ⚡️ kirjasi uudelleen
Ledger’s CTO claims sustaining the alleged 51% attack on Monero via Qubic costs $75M/day.
Off by about three orders of magnitude.
Monero’s actual daily security budget is simple to calculate:
- Tail emission of 0.6 XMR per block
- 720 blocks per day (2-minute intervals)
- XMR ≈ $253
That’s ~$109K/day - the total paid to all miners. This is the true economic incentive securing the network.
Qubic isn’t buying $75M/day worth of hardware or cloud compute. They’re just subsidizing existing Monero miners with their $QUBIC token, luring them into the pool during “idle” compute time.
I’ve run the numbers myself - they can sustain dominance for as little as $7K–$10K/day, nowhere near the inflated $75M figure.
Attacks like this expose a core vulnerability in smaller PoW networks: it’s not always about brute force hashrate sometimes you just need to pay miners more than the chain does.
And if Ledger’s CTO is off by three orders of magnitude on something as basic as Monero’s security budget… I shudder to think what bugs we’d find if we audited their elliptic curve implementation.
50,72K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit
Ketjussa trendaava
Trendaa X:ssä
Viimeisimmät suosituimmat rahoitukset
Merkittävin